Reinventing a Federal government Institution

Division Of Corporations

The corporation may appeal an adverse ruling or decision of the economic development office under Subsection to a district court of Travis County. The substantial evidence rule applies in an appeal under this subsection. Except as limited by this subtitle or rules and guidelines of the economic development office, a corporation has full authority with respect to bonds. An officer of the corporation is elected or appointed at the time, in the manner, and for the term prescribed by the certificate of formation or bylaws, except that an officer’s term may not exceed three years. In the absence of provisions in the certificate of formation or the bylaws prescribing the selection or terms of officers, the board of directors shall annually elect or appoint officers. A unit may authorize the creation of one or more corporations if the resolution authorizing the creation of each corporation specifies the public purpose of the unit to be furthered by the corporation.

Such an order may be issued with respect to a depository institution by its appropriate regulatory agency and with respect to a federally insured credit union by the National Credit Union Administration. The Secretary shall prescribe by regulation standards for the safeguarding and use of obligations that are government securities described in subparagraph or of section 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such regulations shall apply only to a depository institution that is not a government securities broker or a government securities dealer and that holds such obligations as fiduciary, custodian, or otherwise for the account of a customer and not for its own account. Such regulations shall provide for the adequate segregation of obligations so held, including obligations which are purchased or sold subject to resale or repurchase. The words “for its own account and in its own right and interest, at any one time aggregating” and “his approval with respect to any transaction or classes of transactions subject to the provisions of . . . for such period of time and” are omitted as surplus. Subsections and of this section do not apply to the Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, the Central Bank for Cooperatives, the Regional Banks for Cooperatives, and the Federal Land Banks.

2d at 6 (“he Privacy Act only covers disclosures of information which was either directly or indirectly retrieved from a system of records.” (quoting Fisher v. NIH, 934 F. Supp. 464, 473 (D.D.C. 1996))). The District Court for the District of Columbia has explained that “n order for an agency to be liable for a Privacy Act violation allegedly committed by one of its employees, the responsible agency employee must have been acting within the scope of his or her employment.” Convertino v. DOJ, 769 F. This assessment of government corporations examines their records and identifies advantages and failures. The author challenges the reader to think creatively about the government corporate form and ways to reinvent it, capitalizing on its strengths and compensating for its shortcomings.

But while there is always talk of a “grand bargain” on taxes, nobody is willing to be the first to put their tax benefits on the table. When corporations first became politically engaged in the 1970s, their approach to lobbying was largely reactive. They were trying to stop the continued advancement of the regulatory state.

Models are drafted with deceptive titles and descriptions to disguise their true intent. The Asbestos Transparency Act didn’t help people exposed to asbestos. It was written by corporations who wanted to make it harder for victims to recoup money. The “HOPE Act,” introduced in nine states, was written by a conservative advocacy group to make it more difficult for people to get food stamps. For lawmakers, copying model legislation is an easy way to get fully formed bills to put their names on, while building relationships with lobbyists and other potential campaign donors.

The purpose of these boards within a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone is to oversee the administration and financials of the Zone, pursuant to the Tax Increment Financing Act. The Cottonwood Development Corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of benefiting the City by use of the powers granted to the Corporation under Chapter 431, including, without limitation, by aiding, assisting and acting on behalf of the City to promote the common good and general welfare of the City. For temporary amendment of section, see § 2 of the Department of Small and Local Business Development Subcontracting Clarification, Benefit Expansion, and Grant-making Authority Temporary Amendment Act of 2007 (D.C. Law 17-96, January 29, 2008, law notification 55 DCR 3403). For temporary amendment of section, see § 2 of the Department of Small and Local Business Development Subcontracting Clarification Temporary Amendment Act of 2006 (D.C. Law , March 6, 2007, law notification 54 DCR 2761). To produce that theory will require bringing economics and political science and law and sociology into a common crucible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *